R is for Rigor
Rigor is a buzzword in education, but when
looking at the definition it is pretty intimidating. In the dictionary it falls
between rigmarole (a ridiculously complicated process) and rigor mortis
(stiffness after death). Nevertheless, the word has become firmly established
in the current educational lexicon (Kinney, 2008). It seems to be completely
opposite than many peoples philosophy on education as being flexible, lively,
and compassionate. Rigor is creating an environment in which each student is
expected to learn at high levels, each student is supported so they can learn
at high levels, and each student demonstrates learning at high levels
(Blackburn, 2013). Rigor is not making lessons so hard and expecting the
students to learn on their own. It is not giving them unattainable goals that
set them up for failure. Rigor is not just giving students more to do or
punishing them with more homework (Blackburn, 2012). The idea of rigor is to
focus on quality over quantity. Blackburn states, “When it comes to rigor, less
is more. If we expect students to learn at a high level, we must focus on depth
of understanding, not breadth of coverage (Blackburn, 2008, p. 40)”.
E is for Engagement
Raising the bar means to teach on or above
grade level utilizing a variety of engaging teaching strategies. Teaching
strategies play a huge role in how rigorous a lesson comes across. In addition, asking higher level questions
will trigger students to think beyond rote memory. It is also important in how
the teacher responds to answers that are given and that they don’t accept
anything lower than high expectations as well as offers efficient wait time. In
a classroom setting, you have to disguise rigorous work so the students don’t
get overwhelmed. By making the learning
experience engaging, students will strive harder to complete the
task.
A is for Alignment
Being intentional and focusing on the
standards first is very important when planning rigorous lessons. In an article
by Dutchess Maye, the importance of strategic planning is emphasized when it
comes to increasing academic rigor. Maye determined:
Though many of the
teachers’ learning tasks were tightly structured, well-organized and
facilitated, highly engaging creative, and – for the lack of a better word to
capture their appeal to students –cute, the knowledge and cognitive domains
primarily involved students in remembering and understand information through
activities that required listing, identifying, find, naming, defining,
reciting, recognizing, and applying content information within the discipline
through rote, perfunctory tasks. The
effort and energy teachers put into designing these cute, lower-level learning
tasks were quite impressive but ultimately lost luster as the objectives lacked
academic rigor. (Maye, 2013, p. 32)
Maye went on to discuss that strategic planning was essential and that
teachers should carefully examine the targeted standards first and then
select the resources that provide exemplary material for demonstrating the
targeted skills (Maye, 2013, p.33). In
addition to aligning the lesson with the standard, Maye emphasized being
intentional with higher level questions.
Like my school, Maye finds it important to not fly by the seat of your
pants when it comes to questioning. She
came up with an idea called Plan 5
which encouraged teachers to plan at least 5 predetermined questions for the
lesson that would incorporate the higher cognitive levels of Bloom’s
Taxonomy.
C is for Complexity
To increase complexity you need to shift our
attention from isolated facts to application of knowledge (Blackburn, 2008, p.
59). By making learning more applicable, students will have a higher level of
comprehension and will be able to perform at higher levels. The use of projects
and hands on activities allows the opportunity for students to take ownership
and value in their work while also working as motivation. These things
demand the students to demonstrate understanding at a deeper level (Blackburn,
2008, p. 78).
H is for High expectations
Having high expectations starts with the
decision that every student you teach has the potential to be the best, no
matter what (Blackburn, 2008, p. 20). People will only push as far as they are
expected. It is the responsibility to set high standards for students to
reach for.
REACH
Rigor is not an easy thing to step into and
may take trial and error. Changing the
way things are done are going to have to be supported by all involved including
administration, teachers, students, and their parents. Teachers must change how they have always
done things and refigure how they teach and how to extend the content to a new
level. At the same time of making work
less shallow and building the quality, there is a new responsibility to be
creative in how to make the harder lessons more engaging so the students will
not give up. Students are going to have
to learn the true meaning of work ethic just as their parents are going to have
to quit making excuses and support what is going on in the classroom. With the combination of everyone’s
participation, rigor can be successfully implemented in any school setting. It may not take effect immediately but over time
progress will be evident and the character of students will manifest.
Wow, the blog looks great. I hope you keep it up!
ReplyDeleteI really liked that quote from Maye that often we put more effort into the cute than into the substance. That is very true but as you point out in the paragraph above that often we have to hide the rigor so the students are excited and engaged.
This is what makes it so challenging.